Game of Thrones author George R. R. Martin is famed for killing off his characters in an unexpected and spectacular fashion. While it's always difficult to see a beloved character be taken out of the story for good, it makes the stakes feel much higher. Martin clearly has a strict view on how death should be treated in fiction, as he's even criticized The Lord of the Rings' treatment of the concept while raising some fair points.

Ned Stark's death in the first season set the tone for Game of Thrones, showing that even the main characters weren't safe. Arguably the best and easiest example is the Red Wedding, which shook audiences to their core. Despite the controversial views of Game of Thrones' final season, most fans everyone will agree on how impactful that moment was, as several major characters lost their lives in a sudden and undignified manner.

Updated on August 14, 2023, by Ajay Aravind: George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire would have existed without Tolkien's legendarium establishing the framework for epic fantasy. That said, Martin's work is considerably different in that he focuses a lot more on the sociopolitical underpinnings of Westeros than the fantasy elements. The fact that he doesn't like Gandalf's resurrection, however, is an artistic criticism that can be debated at length. As such, we've updated this feature article about George R.R. Martin on Lord of the Rings.

RELATED: Sauron Wasn’t the True Lord of the Rings – It Was Actually [Spoiler]

Why George RR Martin Disagrees With Gandalf's Resurrection

While touched upon in Game of Thrones, the resurrection of dead characters was more common in the novels. However, it was far from the traditional character resurrection found in most fantasy stories. During a Bullseye podcast interview, Martin summed up his philosophy on death, stating, "I do think if you're bringing a character back, that a character has gone through death, that's a transformative experience." And this is reflected through the novels, as returning characters always lose a part of themselves, even to the extent that they can't be considered the same character anymore.

This brings Martin to the subject of The Lord of the Rings. Although he believes author J.R.R. Tolkien treats death as final, for the most part, there's one key exception: Gandalf. As the Fellowship of the Ring attempts to pass through the Mines of Moria, the great Balrog of Khazad-dûm reveals itself. In order for the heroes to escape, Gandalf sacrifices himself on the bridge, resulting in the Wizard and the Balrog falling to their (apparent) doom. The loss is tragic and unexpected. And yet, in the next movie (and in the source material), Gandalf returns, proclaiming, "I come back to you now, at the turn of the tide."

RELATED: Why Gollum Failed & What The Next Lord of the Rings Game Needs to Succeed

However, Martin disagreed with this plot turn. "Much as I admire Tolkien, I once again always felt like Gandalf should have stayed dead...His last words are, 'Fly, you fools!' What power that had, how that grabbed me," he said. As such, Martin felt the words were lessened by the knowledge of Gandalf's return. "Then, he comes back as Gandalf the White, and, if anything, he's sort of improved... I think it would've been an even stronger story if Tolkien had left him dead."

While many fans scoff at the idea of changing such an integral part of The Lord of the Rings, Martin's words hold some merit. Gandalf's death revealed just how dangerous the journey to Mordor would be, as the strongest among them was the first to fall. Then shortly after, Boromir was slain by a pack of Uruk-hai, which felt like the Fellowship was being picked off one by one. But then Gandalf made his grand return as Gandalf the White, and unlike Martin's characters, the Wizard became even more powerful. While it offers a great reveal, the resurrection tells the audience that death isn't necessarily the end, so a sense of danger is lost.

RELATED: This Crucial Lord of the Rings Role Almost Went to Someone Entirely Different

Martin & Tolkien Treat Resurrection Differently

However, going against Martin's point is that he and Tolkien tell drastically different stories. Martin focuses on the gritty, realistic side of his fantasy world, whereas Tolkien tells more fantastical tales. And these different views are perhaps most easily reflected in their treatment of death. When a character is returned to Westeros, part of them is lost as they're going against the natural order of the world.

This can be seen through the death and "resurrection" of Catelyn Stark in the books. Although the character is permanently dead in the TV show, she's actually brought back by Thoros of Myr and Beric Dondarrion. Unfortunately, the rites are performed three days after her death, so what returns to life isn't exactly Catelyn Stark. Known as Lady Stoneheart, this villainous version of the formerly noble Lady of House Stark doesn't behave like her original counterpart. On the contrary, Stoneheart desires the death and destruction of her enemies. In contrast, Gandalf is returned to fulfill a purpose from a higher power and is rewarded for his good deeds in life in The Lord of the Rings.

While Martin raises some fair points, his writing philosophy simply goes against what Tolkien envisioned. More importantly, Gandalf isn't even the true form of Olórin, a divine being known as a Maia. Olórin wore a human disguise to blend in with the peoples of Middle-earth. As such, Gandalf merely loses his human shell when he dies on Zirakzigil. However, he returns to Middle-earth with the blessings of Eru Ilúvatar, the ultimate creator of everyone and everything in The Lord of the Rings. Gandalf's resurrection wasn't just a simple convenience but showed the power of good going against the world's evil and helped spread inspiration to others.